Any of y'all remember the Project For The New American Century? Didn't think so. Well here's some shocking news for you, or at least for me, on Iraq. It turns out that we were looking for a regime change in Iraq as early as 1998! 1998! Three years before any of this 9/11 and anthrax crap ever surfaced, we were already looking to liberate Iraq...under Bill Clinton. Now whether he was also in on this whole Middle Eastern takeover or he was just being a centrist pushover remains to be seen, but we're in Iraq for a reason that PRECEDES the terrorist attacks of 9/11/01.
Bill Kristol cited that weapons inspectors were chased out, but they never tell you how long those inspectors were snooping around, whether those inspectors were really measuring the drapes for some heavy commerce in the future, or whether those weapons of mass destruction could really compare in strength to what we were cooking. Even rogue regimes have a right to defend themselves, and who's arrogant enough to be calling every nation they don't like for some reason rogue to begin with? Israel maybe? America? I'm tired of our troops being used to kill in the name of the Lord.
Look, y'all. The PNAC stated it themselves. This is their plan, and most Republicans, Democrats, and misguided Independents are falling for their crap. Here's just a few of their intentions:
• we need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future;
• we need to strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values;
• we need to promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad
• we need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.
Which OUR are we talking about ladies and gentlemen? Is this country's policy so arrogant to think we can just do whatever we want around the world and NOT expect any blowback? Is it going to take another 9/11 because we backed some other third-world country into a corner and laid another uppercut in order to us to HUMBLE OURSELVES IN THE SIGHT OF THE LORD?
This reminds me of when the Europeans divided and conquered Africa because it wasn't seen as "civilized enough" in their eyes. That Biden/Brownback bill last year to divide Iraq into three parts is another prime example. We're being driven by this "relativism is arrogace disguised as humility," "fair is foul, and foul is fair" mentality.
...and look out for the code words "spreading democracy" because that's the same code language used in Vietnam and Korea when we wanted to open up more shop. Our troops are being misused and anyone who would hide behind the yellow ribbon to justify a haneous foreign policy is supporting an interest mutually exclusive from our troops. Our troops were supposed to defend OUR freedom, NOT everyone else's around the world, well-intentioned as that may be. Who's morals are we trying to "clarify" here?
"Talk and trade with all nations, entangling alliances with none." -Thomas Jefferson
The bible says something about turning your back on Israel and being doomed for it, bu it also says if something causes you to sin, get it out of you (metaphorically speaking of course, don't gouge your eyes out or anything).
Talk and trade is not turning your back on Israel. It can defend itself, but we must not allow it to use Europe or our country as a clutch for killing in the name of the Lord and exploiting the Jewish vote with a little group called AIPAC.
Plain and simple, America. When it comes to the Middle East...BACK OFF!!
It's in our best national security interest.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment